In this brief order, the Allahabad High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution, as no counsel appeared for the applicant in the revised call despite the presence of the State. No substantive decision on the merits was delivered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:198383
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23325 of 2024
Applicant :- Gulzar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Shaafi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Even in the revised call, none appears for the applicant, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 18.12.2024 A.P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gulzar
State Of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Anand Prakash Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
