The applicant sought to quash session trial and cognizance order but did not press the application. The High Court dismissed the application as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:132946
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22832 of 2024
Applicant :- Gautam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ayush Kaushik Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vikas Tiwari
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Ayush Kaushik, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Vikas Tiwari, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri B.N. Upadhyay, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 45 of 2017, (State Vs. Gautam) arising out of Case Crime No. 655 of 2015, under Sections 323, 452, 376 of I.P.C., Police Station-Ichauli, District- Meerut, as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 16.07.2017 pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge/ F.T.C.-Ist, Meerut.
Learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press the present application and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 20.8.2024 Ishan
Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gautam
State of U.P. and Another
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
