Applicant sought quashing of proceedings in a Section 138(1)(b) Indian Electricity Act case. The Department confirmed no electricity dues were pending against him; accordingly all proceedings of Special Case No. 301 of 2018 were quashed and the application was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:137190
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22719 of 2024 Applicant :- Chandrika Vishwakarma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Applicant :- Chandan Kumar Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 27.8.2024
Shafique
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the charge-sheet, cognizance and proceedings of the electricity theft case be quashed given no dues remain pending against the applicant?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Chandrika Vishwakarma
State of U.P.
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
