The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of a charge sheet. The court held that the charge sheet was legally maintainable, that investigation is required to determine the validity of accusations, and the case is not barred by previous judicial pronouncements.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:23353
Court No. - 27
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2203 of 2024 Applicant :- Vimal Singh And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Homelko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhil Anand,Bishlendra Prasad,Prince Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Order Date :- 18.3.2024 Ankit
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned charge sheet filed under Section 323, 324, 504, 506 and 427 IPC is maintainable and registrable.
Whether the High Court has the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the charge sheet on the ground that the accusers are victious.
Whether the alleged circumstances of the case justify an investigation in order to prevent repetition of similar offences.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sri Ramwariyayo vs State of M.P.Distinguished¶7
Sri Ramwariyayo vs State of M.P.
Shashi Gupta vs State of U.P.Applied¶8
Shashi Gupta vs State of U.P.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vimal Singh And 3 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
