This judgment grants an order in applications under Section 482 CrPC regarding non-cognizable offences. The court holds that elaborate findings or prior judicial scrutiny are not essential for invoking Section 482 CrPC and grants relief by invoking the provisions of the relevant Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:23353
Court No. - 27
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2203 of 2024 Applicant :- Vimal Singh And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Homelko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhil Anand,Bishlendra Prasad,Prince Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Order Date :- 18.3.2024 Ankit
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
3 issues framed by the court
Whether Section 482 CrPC can be utilized without elaborate judicial findings in the absence of disproportionate accusation against the applicant?
Whether elaborate enquiry or examination/examination by affidavit is required before utilizing Section 482 CrPC?
Whether relief should be granted immediately if the applicant is not present and has no representation before this court?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
AIR 2023 SC 379Referred¶7
Vimal Singh And 3 Others
Subhash Vidyarti
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
