Application to quash a charge sheet and summoning order in an FIR alleging forgery and criminal conspiracy over fake property entries in L.D.A. records was dismissed; the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence and falsity of allegations cannot be examined in a Section 482 petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:24478
Court No. - 27
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2151 of 2024 Applicant :- Ramanand Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shamshad Ahmad,Bushra Siddiqui,Faraz Ahmad,Mohammad Shahzad Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
had made fake entries in the computer system of the authority in acting under a criminal conspiracy with the other accused persons
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Order Date :- 20.3.2024 Preeti.
Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the charge sheet and cognizance/summoning order against a junior clerk accused of making fake entries in L.D.A. records could be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
C.B.I. v. Aryan SinghRelied on¶6
2023 SCC Online SC 379 · Who else cites this
7 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramanand Ram
State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Opposite Party No. 2
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
