Dharmendra Tiwari v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the applicant even on revised call.
Application under Section 482 dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the applicant even on revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:165543
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 21333 of 2024
Applicant :- Dharmendra Tiwari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Even in the revised call, none appears for the applicant, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 17.10.2024 A.P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharmendra Tiwari
State of U.P.
Another
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court