Ram Karan v. State of U.P. and Another
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:168897
Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19111 of 2024
Applicant :- Ram Karan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
- Heard Sri Vinay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Uday Bhan, learned AGA for the State.
- The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.1219 of 2022, Ram Sagar Vs. Ram Karan, under Section-138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1881'), Police Station-Mutthiganj, DistrictAllahabad, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 9th, Allahabad, as well as summoning order dated 01.05.2023.
- Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is ready to settle the dispute and wants to file compounding application u/s 147 of the Act, 1881 before the trial court. The Apex Court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. reported in 2010 (5) SCC 663 had observed that if the accused persons under the proceeding of 138 of the Act, 1881 did not file the application for compounding on the first date or on the second date, then the court may permit him to file compounding application with the cost of 10% of the cheque amount.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an applicant in a cheque bouncing case can be permitted to move for compounding within a specified time by depositing 10% of the cheque amount.
Whether the High Court can direct the trial court to refrain from taking coercive action pending the disposal of the compounding application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ram Karan
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/19111/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court