Farooq and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicants sought quashing of proceedings in an ongoing criminal case under Sections 498A, 323, 307 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the strength of a compromise. The court directed that the compromise be verified by the trial court and interim relief of no coercive action was granted until the next listing date.
What did the court decide?
No coercive action against applicants until next date of listing (05.09.2024); direction to file compromise application before trial court within two weeks.
What the court decided
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18947 of 2024
Applicant :- Farooq And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mukul Yadav,Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed in Court today, is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of criminal case no. 642 of 2018, arising out of case crime no. 470 of 2017, under Sections 498A, 323, 307 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Mohammadabad, District Ghazipur, pending in the court of A.C.J.M., Ghazipur in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that on account of intervention of the well-wishers, a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and the said compromise will be filed before the court concerned within two weeks from today. It is further contended that proceedings of the aforesaid case may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
Whether a compromise has taken place or not can best be ascertained by the court where the proceedings are pending, after ensuring the presence of the parties before it.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings can be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties pending trial court verification
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Farooq And 5 Others
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/18947/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court