The High Court issued notice only regarding the POCSO Act charges and directed the trial court to proceed with the remaining IPC offences, implying the quashing application was partially entertained or limited to the specific statutory provision challenged.
Notice issued w.r.t. POCSO Act; trial court directed to proceed for rest of offences.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
*********
(Sl.No. 13)
Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18576 of 2024
Applicant :- Jagdish Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vipin Gangwar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
5. Put up on 30.09.2024 in the additional cause list.
Order Date :- 31.8.2024 Kirti
(Anish Kumar Gupta, J.)
Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the summons under Sections 7/8 of the POCSO Act against the applicant deserves to be quashed due to lack of disclosure of offence?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Jagdish
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
