Dismissed

Angad Pathak and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Allahabad HC5 Jan 2024A482/18/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Section 482 Cr.P.C. application for quashing a charge-sheet and summoning order was disposed of without deciding on merits. Directed that if the petitioner surrenders and files a bail application within 15 days, the lower court must dispose of it expeditiously following Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Notice to opposite party dispensed. Petitioner directed to surrender within 15 days and seek bail, which lower court must expeditiously dispose of following Satender Kumar Antil.

Angad Pathak and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:1310 Court No. - 11 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18 of 2024 Applicant :- Angad Pathak And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶3

Heard Sri Arvind Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA.

¶4

In view of the proposed order, the notice to opposite party No.2 is hereby dispensed with.

¶5

The petitioners have filed this 482 Cr.P.C. petition praying for quashing of the charge-sheet no. 1 of 2023 dated 8.10.2023 as well as summoning order dated 24.11.2023 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gonda in Case No. 21020 of 2023 (State of U.P. vs. Angad Pathak and others) whereby the petitioners have been summoned for trial u/s 325, 308, 452, 323, 504 & 506 IPC bearing F.I.R. No. 194 of 2023, P.S. Dhanepur, District Gonda.

¶6

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed that the petitioners are ready to surrender before the learned court below and wants to move an application for bail, therefore, direction may be issued to the learned court below for expeditious disposal of bail application of the petitioners.

¶7

Learned Additional Government Advocate for the State has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

¶8

Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant petition is disposed of . However, it is provided that in case the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of 15 days from today and moves application for bail relating to the aforesaid criminal case, the same shall be considered and disposed of in the light of dictum of Apex Court in re: Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and others in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 with expedition without adjourning the case for any unnecessary reason.

¶9

(Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.)

¶10

Order Date :- 5.1.2024/Om

¶11

Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Angad Pathak and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Angad Pathak and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pooja Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Alok Gautam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt.of Home and Another

Laddan Khan and 7 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home Deptt Govt of Up Civil Sectt Lko and 2 Others

Ram Diwakar Verma Alias Ramdiwakar and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Angad Pathak and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Ravi Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.