The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution due to the applicant's counsel being absent on the last date and the present date.
Application dismissed with a cost of Rs. 1000/- payable to High Court Bar Association.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14805 of 2024
Applicant :- Harun Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Sri Manoj Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for applicants is not diligent to pursue this case as not only today he is absent but on last date i.e. 26.06.2024, he remained absent.
In the aforesaid circumstances, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution with a cost of Rs.1000/- to be deposited in the account of High Court Bar Association.
A copy of this order be sent to applicant on his given address as well as learned Trial Court concerned.
Registrar (Compliance) to take steps.
Order Date :- 6.9.2024 P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harun
State Of Up And 2 Others
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
P. Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
