Disposed

Adarsh Pandey and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko. and Anothrer

Allahabad HC19 Dec 2024A482/11701/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of an application seeking quashing of a charge sheet and proceedings under varying IPC sections, granting liberty to file bail and discharge applications to be decided expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Disposed with liberty to file bail and discharge applications to be decided expeditiously; no coercive action for 30 days.

Adarsh Pandey and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:85330

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11701 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Adarsh Pandey And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko. And Anothrer Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Singh Yadav,Piyush Pathak,Vijay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.

¶7

The present application has been filed for quashing of the Charge Sheet dated 13.08.2023, in Case Crime No.0146/2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 427 I.P.C., at Police Station Chapiya, District Gonda (Annexure No.1 to the application) and also for quashing the summoning order dated 02.01.2024 and entire criminal proceedings pending before the learned trial court.

¶8

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court, which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be decided expeditiously.

¶9

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants.

¶10

Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶11

Liberty is also granted to the applicants to move discharge application before the court below and the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶12

Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation

¶13

made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicants apply for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶14

With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of.

¶15

Order Date :- 19.12.2024

¶16

ML/-

¶17

Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Adarsh Pandey and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko. and Anothrer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Adarsh Pandey and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko. and Anothrer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vikas Chand Ojha Vs Judicial Magistrate I Gonda and Ors.

Ram Dhari Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Azmuddin @ Fauji Vs Distt. and Sessions Judge Dist. Sultanpur and 4 Others

Sumi Patel Thru. Her Husband Niraj Kumar Varma vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

Umesh (Mentioned as Umesh Nishad in the First Information Report) and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Adarsh Pandey and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko. and Anothrer