Lalita Devi v. Dir. of Enforcement Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant sought quashing of a PMLA complaint and cognizance order naming her as accused despite absence from the predicate offence; the court deferred consideration pending counter affidavit.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11244 of 2024
Applicant :- Lalita Devi Opposite Party :- Dir. Of Enforcement Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Shivanshu Goswami,Anuuj Taandon,Prerna Jalan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rohit Tripathi
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
- Heard Sri Anuuj Taandon and Sri Shivanshu Goswami, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Shiv P. Shukla, learned counsel for the Enforcement Directorate.
- By means of this application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant has prayed following reliefs:-
"WHEREFORE it is most respectfully prayed that in the aforesaid facts and circumstances the application preferred under section 482 Cr.P.C. Corresponding to Section 528 Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2024 (BNSS) may kindly be allowed and the impugned cognizance order along with Complaint and the entire criminal proceedings in respect of the applicant arising out of Complaint Case No. 3514/2023 ECIR No. 03/PMLA/LKZO/2013 P.S Enforcement Directorate under Section 3/4 Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 pending before Hon'ble Court of Special Judge, CBI Court No. 1 / Special Court PMLA Lucknow may kindly be quashed/set-aside in the interest of justice and/or may pass any such order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice."
- Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the predicate case relates to the allegations regarding certain misappropriation that occurred in the District Co-operative Bank Kishunpur dated 16.06.2011 (under Sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 469 & 471 of IPC registered with P.S. Kishunpur, District Fatehpur on the basis of complaint/report filed by one Sri Ajit Kumar Verma, Deputy General Manager/enquiry officer of Fatehpur District Cooperative Bank Ltd., Fatehpur. Subsequently, the SIB, CID filed Charge-sheet No.02/2013 dated 30.01.2013 in respect of Bhola Singh along with Mahaveer Prasad Upadhyay, Vijay Shankar Tiwari, Abhay Singh Chauhan, Jai Pal Singh in the District Co-operative Bank, Kishunpur. The applicant Lalita Devi has not been chargesheeted in any of the charge sheet pertaining to schedule offence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lalita Devi
- respondent
Dir. Of Enforcement Lko.
Coram
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/11244/2024
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mohammad Talha and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Taslim Khan and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and 2 Others
Akash Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others
Abhishek Dixit @ Monu Dixit Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another