Govind Prasad v. State of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Barabanki and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 227 directed a lower court to decide a pending application for framing issues within two months.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:84878
Court No. - 7
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6156 of 2024
Petitioner :- Govind Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Barabanki And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Bhanu Sharma,Suneel Kumar
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1 . Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.
2 . The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"I. direct the leaned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 13, Barabanki to decide the application for framing and proper issues under Order 14 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code, filed by the petitioner which is number as C-143 dated 06.03.2021 in Regular Civil Suit No.497 of 1998 (Govind Prasad Vs. State of U.P. through District Magistrate Barabanki & others) before further proceeding of the suit for the evidence of defendants."
3 . Considering the relief as sought, the present petition is disposed off directing the court concerned to consider and decide the aforesaid application in accordance with law with all expedition preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Govind Prasad
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Pankaj Bhatia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- A227/6156/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Pankaj Bhatia
- Order 2 — this page · Pankaj Bhatia
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Smt. Nirmala Pandey and Ors. Vs Additional District Judge Court No. 13 Sultanpur and Ors.
Satya Dev Singh Vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of Finance,New Delhi and 4 Others
Rahul Gautam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 9 Others
M/S Adore Infrasmith Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorised Representative Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Infrastructure Industrial Development Lko and Another