Petition seeking expedited disposal of a pending Section 35 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 case before the Tehsildar. The court directed the authority to finally decide the proceedings expeditiously with full opportunity of hearing and without unnecessary adjournments, without examining merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:72277
Court No. - 8
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5241 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ramraj Respondent :- Tehsildar (Judicial ) Gauriganj Distt. Amethi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No. 1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.
In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No. 2 to 3 is dispensed with.
By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case No. 00167 of 2020, computerized Case No. T-202004710100167 filed under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1.
It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided.
Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.
Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No. 00167 of 2020, computerized Case No. T-202004710100167 filed under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.
It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall consider and decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .
Order Date :- 25.10.2024/Asheesh
Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tehsildar should be directed to expeditiously decide the pending Section 35 U.P. Revenue Code case filed by the petitioner?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramraj
Tehsildar (Judicial) Gauriganj Distt. Amethi
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
