Disposed

Ramraj v. Tehsildar (Judicial ) Gauriganj Distt. Amethi and 2 Others

Allahabad HC25 Oct 2024/5241/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petition under Article 227 sought expeditious disposal of a pending Section 35 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 case before the Tehsildar. The High Court directed the authority to finally decide the case expeditiously with full opportunity of hearing and no unnecessary adjournments, without examining merits.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.1 directed to consider and finally decide Case No. 00167 of 2020 (T-202004710100167) expeditiously, with full opportunity of hearing, without unnecessary adjournments; no merits examined

Ramraj Vs Tehsildar (Judicial ) Gauriganj Distt. Amethi… — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:72277

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5241 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ramraj Respondent :- Tehsildar (Judicial ) Gauriganj Distt. Amethi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No. 1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶6

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No. 2 to 3 is dispensed with.

¶7

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case No. 00167 of 2020, computerized Case No. T-202004710100167 filed under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1.

¶8

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided.

¶9

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No. 00167 of 2020, computerized Case No. T-202004710100167 filed under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶11

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall consider and decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶12

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶13

Order Date :- 25.10.2024/Asheesh

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ramraj v. Tehsildar (Judicial ) Gauriganj Distt. Amethi and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramraj v. Tehsildar (Judicial ) Gauriganj Distt. Amethi and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Binda Gupta and Another Vs Addl. Commissioner, (Judicial), Prayagraj Division Prayagraj and Others

Ibrar Khan and Others Vs Addl. Commissioner (Administration ), Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and Others

Awadhesh Singh and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Collector, Deoria and Others

Md. Vaseem vs the Commissioner Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, Faizabad and Others

M/S Raj Corporation Limited Thru. Authorized Signatory Priyanshu Yadav vs Engineer-in-Chief and Head of Department, Public Works Department and others

Ankita Verma vs Sarvesh Kumar