Disposed

Awadhesh Singh and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Collector, Deoria and Others

Allahabad HC24 Oct 2024/5085/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 227, the High Court directed the respondent authority to dispose of a pending land revenue case under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, within four months after the petitioner furnished an undertaking not to seek unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to dispose of Case REV/145/1996-1997 under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, within 4 months upon petitioner's undertaking.

Awadhesh Singh and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru… — Land Acquisition | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:71852

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5085 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Awadhesh Singh And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Deoria And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shesh Nath Tiwari,Vijay Shankar Padey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No. 1 and 2 has been has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no. 3-Gaon Sabha.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent Nos. to 4 to 12 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case bearing REV/145/1996-1997 computerized Case no. R199709380010815 filed under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 pending before the respondent No.2.

¶9

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided.

¶10

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

Learned standing counsel has drawn the attention of the Court to the extract of the order-sheet and has pointed out that in majority of the dates, the proceedings before the respondent No.2 could not advance on account of the resolution passed by the Members of the Bar abstaining from judicial work.

¶12

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to furnish an undertaking that the petitioner will not seek any unnecessary adjournment and shall also cooperate in the early disposal of the aforesaid case.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the

¶14

opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case bearing REV/145/1996-1997 computerized Case no. R199709380010815 filed under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of four months from the date an authenticated copy of this order is placed before the authority concerned provided there is no legal impediment.

¶15

The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking, as mentioned above, along with a copy of this order. In case, if the petitioner does not furnish the aforesaid undertaking, then the petitioner shall not be entitled to the benefit of this order.

¶16

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall consider and decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶17

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶18

Order Date :- 24.10.2024 Asheesh

¶19

Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Awadhesh Singh and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Collector, Deoria and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Awadhesh Singh and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Collector, Deoria and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sudhir Kumar Prajapati @ Sudhir Kumar Vs Up Ziladhikari, Tahsil Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow and Others

Sunil Dutt Pandey and Another Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gonda and Others

Kailash @ Kailash Nath Vs Addl. Commissioner Administration-I Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and Others

Smt. Binda Gupta and Another Vs Addl. Commissioner, (Judicial), Prayagraj Division Prayagraj and Others

Ibrar Khan and Others Vs Addl. Commissioner (Administration ), Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and Others

Molhe Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lucknow and Others