Disposed

Dasiya Devi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Allahabad HC3 Dec 2024A227/4776/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought expedite order for pending revenue petition under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Court directed authorities to dispose of matter expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondent No. 2 to consider and finally decide the pending petition under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.

Dasiya Devi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of… — Land Acquisition | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:80589

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4776 of 2024 Petitioner :- Dasiya Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Revenue, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Kant Giri Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶6

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.3 is dispensed with.

¶7

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case bearing No. RST/202302570501137 filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.2.

¶8

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided.

¶9

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case bearing No. RST/202302570501137 filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.2 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶11

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall consider and decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶12

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶13

Order Date :- 3.12.2024 Asheesh

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Dasiya Devi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dasiya Devi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ayub Khan Vs Divisional Commissioner, Ayodhya and 4 Others

Riyaz Ahmad Khan and Others Vs District Magistrate / District Deputy Director of Consolidation, Balrampur and Others

Vinod Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Ashutosh Srivastava vs I.C.I.C.I. Bank Ltd. through its Regional Manager, and Another

Housila Prasad vs Addl. Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and Others

Bharti Axa Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Thru. Managing Director and Another vs State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission U.P. Lko. Thru. President/Registrar and Another