In proceedings under Article 227, the petitioner withdrew the article on the ground of infructuousness, and the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:79752
Court No. - 8
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4686 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ayub Khan Respondent :- Divisional Commissioner, Ayodhya And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Abul Kasim Zaidi,Prabhat Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Shri Mohd. Kumail Haider, holding brief of Shri Syed Abul Kasim Zaidi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the passage of time, the relief has sought has become infructuous and he does not wish to press the petition.
Accordingly it is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 2.12.2024 ank
Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ayub Khan
Divisional Commissioner, Ayodhya
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
