Ayub Khan v. Divisional Commissioner, Ayodhya and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Hearing adjourned due to illness of primary counsel and absence of alternate counsel in a writ petition under Article 227.
Hearing adjourned due to illness of primary counsel and absence of alternate counsel in a writ petition under Article 227.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4686 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ayub Khan Respondent :- Divisional Commissioner, Ayodhya And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Abul Kasim Zaidi,Prabhat Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.]
Order Date :- 1.10.2024 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ayub Khan
Divisional Commissioner, Ayodhya
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court