Disposed

Colorful Estates Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Auth. Signatory Kushagra Pal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Infrastructure and Industrial Development,Lko. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC10 Sept 2024A227/4321/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this matter under Article 227, the High Court disposed of a petition seeking a direction for expeditious disposal of a pending revision and restraint on coercive measures. The Court held that since the opposite parties confirmed no sealing orders affecting the petitioner's properties had been passed, the petition was disposed of with a direction for swift disposal of the revision.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; direction issued for expeditious disposal of Revision No. 3297/77-424/145 Appeal/23 without unnecessary adjournments.

Colorful Estates Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Auth. Signatory… — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:62824

¶2

Court No. - 19

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4321 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Colorful Estates Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Auth. Signatory Kushagra Pal

¶5

Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Infrastructure And Industrial Development,Lko. And 2 Others

¶6

Counsel for Petitioner :- Apoorva Tewari,Siddharth Nandwani Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Waseeq Uddin Ahmed

¶7

Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶8

Heard Sri Apoorva Tewari, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Prafull Kumar Yadav, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel representing the State of U.P. and Sri Waseeq Uddin Ahmed, the learned counsel for New Okhla Industrial Development Authority.

¶9

By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought a direction to the State Government for expeditious disposal of Revision No. 3297/77-4-24/145 Appeal/23 as also to restrain the opposite parties from taking any coercive steps against the petitioner till disposal of the aforesaid revision. It has been stated in the petition that the revision is fixed for hearing on 20.09.2024. Meanwhile a news article was published in Hindi daily newspaper Amar Ujala on 05..09.2024 to the effect that an order for sealing of the petitioner's property has been passed by New Okhla Industrial Development Authority.

¶10

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that till final disposal of the revision no coercive measures should be taken against the petitioner as the same would defeat the ends of justice.

¶11

On the basis of written instructions provided by the General Manager (Planning), NOIDA, Sri Waseeq Uddin Ahmed, the learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 has provided a list of properties regarding which sealing orders have been passed, which does not include any property of the petitioner which is affected by the proceedings pending before the opposite party no. 1. As per instructions provided to the learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 & 3, no order for ceiling of any property which is subject matter of the pending revision, has been passed.

¶12

In view of the aforesaid written instructions provided to the learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 and the statement made by him before the Court accordingly, the petitioner has no reason to be aggrieved and no ground is made out for making any interference, when the revision is fixed for 20.09.2024 for final disposal.

¶13

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of by providing that the opposite party no. 1 shall dispose of Revision No. 3297/77-424/145 Appeal/23 expeditiously, without granting unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties.

¶14

Order Date :- 11.9.2024 Pradeep/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Colorful Estates Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Auth. Signatory Kushagra Pal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Infrastructure and Industrial Development,Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Colorful Estates Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Auth. Signatory Kushagra Pal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Infrastructure and Industrial Development,Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Bajpeyi Vs Additional District and Sessions Judge Court No 15 Lko. and 2 Others

Ajay Kumar Rawat Vs State of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow

Lallu Ram Vs District Judge, Distt. Shrawasti and 5 Others

Mohd. Azim and another vs Mohd. Ishaq and others

Smt. Vandana vs Shyam Kumar

Kanchan Kankubji Gupta vs Smt. Sangeeta Devi