The petitioner sought directions to expedite pending suit No. R.A.C. 13 of 2022 and subsequently moved to withdraw the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as non-pressed and directed office action regarding enclosed documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:56177
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3844 of 2024
Petitioner :- Sahab Deen Respondent :- A.D.J-13, Lucknow, District-Lucknow And 57 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Angrej Nath Shukla
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 14.8.2024 DiVYa
Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petition should be allowed or dismissed being not pressed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sahab Deen
A.D.J-13, Lucknow
57 Others
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
