A purely procedural order under Article 227 recording that notice to opposite parties no.4 to 7 was sufficient service at their registered addresses, no fresh notice was needed, and the matter was listed as fresh on 10.09.2024 on joint request of counsel. It decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3194 of 2024
Petitioner :- Digant Kumar Khandelwal And 3 Others Respondent :- Sachin Khandelwal And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Pathak,Anamika Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Ankit Srivastava
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.]
Order Date :- 5.9.2024 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Digant Kumar Khandelwal And 3 Others
Sachin Khandelwal And 6 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
