Matters under Article 227 dismissed as infructuous because the statement sought to be recorded has already been recorded by the respondent district judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:80416
Court No. - 7
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2330 of 2024
Petitioner :- Atahar Ali Respondent :- District Judge, Pratapgarh And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Mishra,Vivek Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Sanjay Kumar Srivastava,Akshat Kumar
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Present petition has been filed challenging the orders whereby application for recording the statement was allowed. Civil revision preferred against the said order was also dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent informs that statement in terms of the said order has already been recorded.
3. In view thereof, nothing survives in the writ petition. Present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. However, the parties would be entitled to raise all the issues when the matter is finally decided.
Order Date :- 3.12.2024 nishant
Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Atahar Ali
District Judge, Pratapgarh
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
