Disposed

Meena Devi v. Nayab Tehsildar Mawai and Another

Allahabad HC8 Jan 2024A227/21/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Article 227 petition regarding mutation proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code, the High Court dispensed with notice to the private respondent and directed the respondent authority to dispose of the pending case expeditiously within three months, ensuring a full hearing to parties without adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to dispose of Case No. 2666/2023 within three months after full hearing without adjournment.

Meena Devi vs Nayab Tehsildar Mawai and Another — Land Acquisition | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:1581

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 21 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Meena Devi Respondent :- Nayab Tehsildar Mawai And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sujeet Kumar Sahu Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶7

In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with.

¶8

By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Case No. 2666/2023, Computerized Case No. T202304230702666 (Meena Devi vs. Maheenpta), filed under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending before the respondent No. 1/Nayab Tehsildar, Mawai, Tehsil Rudauli, District Ayodhya.

¶9

Considering the fact that the case in issue relates to mutation and as per Rule 34(7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the mutation proceedings, being summary in nature, ought to have been decided within 45 days if there is no dispute and if there is dispute, then the same should preferably be decided within 90 days, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the Case No. 2666/2023, Computerized Case No. T202304230702666 (Meena Devi vs. Maheenpta) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting any adjournment to either party preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard.

¶10

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶11

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 8.1.2024 Arun/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Meena Devi v. Nayab Tehsildar Mawai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meena Devi v. Nayab Tehsildar Mawai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kashi Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revnue, Lucknow and 5 Others

Ram Dhiraj Vs Learned Court of Addl. Commissioner (Administration) Lko. Mandal, Lko. and 5 Others

Shakuntala Soni Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 4 Others

Meena Devi Vs Nayab Tehsildar Mawai and Another

Meena Devi Vs Nayab Tehsildar , Mawai, Distt, Ayodhya and Another

Geeta Devi Vs Nayab Tehsildar Tehsil Dhaneypur Distt. Gonda and 3 Others