The petitioner sought directions to comply with revenue orders. The respondent stated that the order dated 16.09.2016 was complied with. The Court held the petition infructuous and dismissed it.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:1186
Court No. - 7
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5257 of 2023
Petitioner :- Kashi Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revnue, Lucknow And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohit Kumar Sahu,Sati Prasad Singh @ Satish Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anshuman
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
(i) To issue an order or direction commanding the opposite parties to comply with the order dated 16.09.2016 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Beekapur, Ayodhya, Computerised Case No.2016042345032455, under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code and Judgment and decree dated 09.05.2022 passed by Commissioner, Ayodhya Division in Appeal No.113 of 2017, Computerised Case No.20170400113 under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Bhanu Pratap and Others vs. Kashiram and Others) by which confirmed the Kurra dated 28.05.2016.
(ii) To issue an order or direction commanding the opposite parties no.2 & 3 to decide the application for execution dated 19.04.2023 and 10.06.2023 for compliance of order dated 16.09.2016 passed by opposite party no.3, in the interest of justice.
Order Date :- 5.1.2024 Manoj K.
Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Article 227 has become infructuous due to compliance of the impugned order.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kashi Ram
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revnue, Lucknow
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
