Disposed

Vijay Pal v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko and 2 Others

Allahabad HC17 Sept 2024/7904/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation for medical reimbursement to the District Panchayatraj Adhikari. It directed the authority to decide the representation within six weeks via a reasoned order.

What did the court decide?

Permitted petitioner to prefer fresh representation within 10 days; directed authority to decide within six weeks with reasoned order.

Vijay Pal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:63834

¶2

Court No. - 4

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7904 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Vijay Pal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishun Narain Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶6

1. Heard Sri Vishnu Narain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Deepshikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel-II for the State.

¶7

2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

¶8

"(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of medical reimbursement as claimed by the petitioner, to the petitioner."

¶9

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 24.07.2024 to the opposite party No.3, but no decision has been taken on the same till date.

¶10

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time.

¶11

5. Learned Chief Standing Counsel-II has stated that she has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time.

¶12

6. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the District Panchayatraj Adhikari, District-Hardoi taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of ten days from today,

¶13

and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith.

¶14

7. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally.

¶15

[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]

¶16

Order Date :- 17.9.2024 Suresh/

¶17

Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vijay Pal v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Pal v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Khushi Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Sujan Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow and 4 Others

Dhoop Narayan @ Dhrup Narayan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Govind Kumar Gupta vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Fishery Deptt. Lko and 3 Others

Mukesh Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Mishri Singh Chauhan vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko and 2 Others