Disposed

Sujan Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow and 4 Others

Allahabad HC13 Sept 2024/7867/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench dismissed the merits of the petition seeking salary fixation and arrears. Instead, it allowed the petitioner to file a fresh representation with a strict directive to the competent authority to dispose of it within ten weeks with a reasoned order.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to move fresh representation within 10 days. Authority to dispose within 10 weeks with reasoned order.

Sujan Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:63655

¶2

Court No. - 4

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7867 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Sujan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sudhir Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite parties.

¶7

By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief :

¶8

"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 3 & 4 to carry out the fixation of salary of petitioner in terms of government order dated 26.08.1977 and G. O. dated 18.05.1983 contained ANNEXURE No.3 & 4 to this writ petition.

¶9

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay arrear of difference of salary after fixation along with appropriate interest."

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that ends of justice would suffice if he is allowed to move a fresh representation before the competent authority and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time.

¶11

With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage.

¶12

Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within 10 days before the opposite party no. 4 / competent authority enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the competent authority concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of the certified copy of this order.

¶13

The competent authority shall communicate the decision on the representation to the petitioner forthwith.

¶14

Writ petition is finally disposed of .

¶15

Order Date :- 13.9.2024 Om

¶16

Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sujan Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujan Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Women Constable Civil Police Pno. No. 192733162 Soni Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and 4 Others

Satya Om Prajapati and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Irrigation and Water Resource Lko. and 3 Others

Rajesh Prajapati Vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Home New Delhi and 2 Others

Mrs. Bindu Jha Alias Bindu Kumari and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Medical Health and Family Welfare and 2 Others

Shashi Prabha Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Rural Developement, Lucknow and Others

Nitin Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another