Disposed

Khushi Ram v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC13 Sept 2024/7870/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court without entering into merits permitted the petitioner to move a fresh representation to the divisional director. The respondent was directed to decide it with a reasoned order within six weeks after affording a hearing. The Writ Petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Permission to move fresh representation; opposite party directed to decide with reasoned order within six weeks after hearing.

Khushi Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:63585

¶2

Court No. - 4

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7870 of 2024 Petitioner :- Khushi Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And Another

¶4

Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Chandra Chauhan,Kashi Ram Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶6

Heard Sri P..C. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Aditya Dwivedi, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite parties.

¶7

By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief :

¶8

"(i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the minimum of the pay scale as has been given to similarly situated person namely Pawan Kumar Singh vide order dated 16.1.2023 till their regularization on group "D" posts.

¶9

(ii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.2 provide the benefit of Government letter No. writ105/81-3-2023-300(12)/2009, dated 22.2.2023 issued by the Chief Conservator of Forest and Head of Department."

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that ends of justice would suffice if he is allowed to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2 and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time.

¶11

With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage.

¶12

Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within 10 days before the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Divisional Director of Forest, Social Forestry Division, Sitapur taking all his pleas and grounds and enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the opposite party concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date of production of the certified copy of this order.

¶13

The decision on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith.

¶14

Writ petition is finally disposed of .

¶15

Order Date :- 13.9.2024/Om

¶16

[Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.]

¶17

Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Khushi Ram v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khushi Ram v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Women Constable Civil Police Pno. No. 192733162 Soni Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and 4 Others

Satya Om Prajapati and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Irrigation and Water Resource Lko. and 3 Others

Rajesh Prajapati Vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Home New Delhi and 2 Others

Mrs. Bindu Jha Alias Bindu Kumari and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Medical Health and Family Welfare and 2 Others

Shashi Prabha Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Rural Developement, Lucknow and Others

Nitin Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another