This petition under Article 227 sought expeditious disposal of an appeal. The court dismissed it because it claimed incorrect relief and lacked necessary details regarding other pending appeals consolidated in the same judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:78918
Court No. - 8
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5714 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ram Kishun And 2 Others Respondent :- Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial)/ Asstt Collector, 1st, Class, Laharpur, Sitapur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Shekhar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Order Date :- 28.11.2024 Ashutosh
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition seeking expeditious disposal should be entertained when it claims incorrect relief and lacks details of other pending appeals.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Kishun And 2 Others
Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial)/ Asstt Collector, 1st, Class, Laharpur, Sitapur And Others
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
