This is a writ petition under Article 227 regarding an application under Section 38 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 8
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5123 of 2024
Petitioner :- Gireesh Kumar Respondent :- Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Nighasan, Kheri Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Maurya,Arvind Kumar Maurya,Kanchan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, who submitted that the instant petition has been preferred seeking expeditious disposal of an application preferred under Section 38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
The aforesaid statement is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view thereof, the instant petition is dismissed having become infructuous .
Order Date :- 5.11.2024 Rakesh/-
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Gireesh Kumar
Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Nighasan, Kheri
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
