Mishrilal @ Mishrilal Maurya v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue, Lucknow and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner did not wish to press the Article 227 petition. Court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Petitioner did not wish to press the Article 227 petition. Court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:72746
Court No. - 8
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4709 of 2024
Petitioner :- Mishrilal @ Mishrilal Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd Hidayat Ullah Ansari,Shashendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
A request has been made on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner does not wish to press the petition as such it may be dismissed as not press.
Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection.
In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 4.11.2024 Rakesh/-
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mishrilal @ Mishrilal Maurya
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lucknow
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court