Disposed

Smt. Sadhna Tripathi v. the Commissioner and Registrar Cooperative U.P. Lko. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC25 Jan 2024/489/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition seeking a direction to decide a representation for transfer/absorption was disposed of with liberty to file a fresh representation before the concerned authority and a deadline of six weeks for final decision.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation; direction to concerned authority to pass final decision within six weeks.

Smt. Sadhna Tripathi Vs the Commissioner… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:7378

¶2

Court No. - 17

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 489 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Smt. Sadhna Tripathi Respondent :- The Commissioner And Registrar Cooperative U.P. Lko. And 5 Others

¶5

Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Neeraj Chaurasiya,Prashast Puri

¶6

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties no.1, 2 and 3, Mr. Prashast Puri, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.4 whose power filed today in Court is taken on record, Mr. R. K. Chaudhary, learned counsel for opposite party no.5 and Mr. Neeraj Chaurasiya, learned counsel for opposite party no.6.

¶8

Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to consider and decide petitioner's representation for absorption/transfer from the opposite party no.6 i.e. Secretary/ General Manager, District Cooperative Bank Ltd. New Civil Lines, Hardoi, Opposite party no.5 i.e. Secretary/ Chief Executive Officer, District Cooperative Bank Ltd., Lucknow.

¶9

In furtherance of letter dated 07.02.2019, learned counsel for opposite parties submit that the representation has been preferred to wrong authority since it was required to be preferred to opposite party no.4 i.e. Secretary, U.P. Cooperative Institutional Service Board, Lucknow which can pass such orders only in case both the Cooperative Societies give their consent.

¶10

Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before concerned authority who shall take final decision thereupon within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before said authority.

¶11

With the aforesaid observation, petition stands disposed of .

¶12

Order Date : - 25.1.2024 Subodh/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Smt. Sadhna Tripathi v. the Commissioner and Registrar Cooperative U.P. Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sadhna Tripathi v. the Commissioner and Registrar Cooperative U.P. Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Mishra Vs Adhishasi Adhikari, Nagarpalika Parishad, Raebareli and Another

Smt. Manoj Bala Sharma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education U.P. and 3 Others

Yadav Nisha Ramkumar @ Yadav Nisha Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Basic Edu. Lko.

Punam @ Kumari Punam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 3 Others

Guru Bachan Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secretary Secondary Education and Others

Vrij Mohan Goswami Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Technical Education, Lucknow and Others