Disposed

Mohhammad Shakeel and Others v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya and Others

Allahabad HC17 Oct 2024/4865/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the court disposed of the application without noticing private opposite parties, directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) to decide a pending revision petition expeditiously within six months.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of without adverting to merits; direction to Additional Commissioner (Judicial) to decide the revision petition within six months.

Mohhammad Shakeel and Others Vs Addl… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:69810

¶2

Court No. - 19

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4865 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Mohhammad Shakeel And Others Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Misra,Kapil Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.

¶6

1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

¶7

2. The instant application has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No. 01239 of 2020 vide Computerized Case No. C202004000001239 (Shakeel Ahmad & Ors. vs. Sayad Abdul Kadeer & Ors), pending before respondent no.1Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya, within a stipulated period of time.

¶8

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a revision petition has been filed by the opposite party nos. 2 to 6 before the Additional Commissioners (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya, wherein the petitioners herein are the opposite parties in the said revision petition. The same is pending since 2020 and in terms of Rule 183 Sub-clause (4), the revision ought to have been decided preferably within a period of six months. In view thereof, he seeks a direction for expeditious disposal of the revision petition.

¶9

4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State does not oppose the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

5. Looking at the facts and circumstances and the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court does not deem it appropriate to issue notice to the private opposite party nos. 2 and 6 and keep the matter pending here, which will further delay the proceedings of the aforesaid case.

¶11

6. In view thereof, the instant petition is disposed of without adverting to the merits of the case with a direction to the Additional Commissioners (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya, to decide the revision petition being Case No. 01239 of 2020 titled as Shakeel Ahmad & Ors. vs. Sayad Abdul

¶12

Kadeer & Ors., as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.

¶13

Order Date :- 17.10.2024 Shubham Arya

¶14

(Anish Kumar Gupta, J.)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mohhammad Shakeel and Others v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohhammad Shakeel and Others v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Duryodhan Singh Vs D.D.C. and Others

Rani Devi Vs Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil Bangar Mau, Unnaoand Another

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Ashadevi Vs Board of Revenue,U.P. at Lucknow Thru. Its Secy. and 4 Others

Rajendra Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Auraiya and Others

Babu Khan Vs Settlement Officer Consolidation, Amethi and Others