Petitioner sought disposal of a representation on a service-related grievance before respondent no. 2. Court, without examining merits, directed that the representation be decided by reasoned and speaking order and disposed of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:42831
Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4697 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ashwani Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Sugarcane Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jay Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 3.
2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
4. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.2 then the respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation.
5. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 11.6.2024 prateek
Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent no. 2 would decide the petitioner's representation regarding his claim within a fixed time frame.
Ashwani Kumar Pandey
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Sugarcane Lko And 5 Others
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
