Counsel for the petitioner was on sanctioned leave; the court directed the matter to be listed after expiry of the leave as fresh. No substantive decision was rendered.
Listing order only. The High Court noted that petitioner's counsel was on sanctioned leave and adjourned the matter to be listed as fresh after expiry of the leave. It decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5740 of 2024
Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Pandey Respondent :- Tehsildar Judicial, Tehsil Rudauli, Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Shri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner is reported to be on sanctioned leave.
List after expiry of sanctioned leave as fresh.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 29.11.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh Kumar Pandey
Tehsildar Judicial, Tehsil Rudauli, Ayodhya
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
