Disposed¶11

Nabi Ahmed v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 6 Others

Allahabad HC6 Aug 2024/3657/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expedition of trial; Article 227 jurisdiction; direction for early disposal of civil suit; requirement of urgency application before approaching High Court; Original Suit No. 258 of 2015 (Lalbahadur vs. Nabi Ahmed and others); Civil Judge (Senior Division) FTC, Ambedkar Nagar; petition disposed of with liberty; no unnecessary adjournments; opportunity of hearing; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Manish Kumar, J.; order dated 6.8.2024.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of Original Suit No. 258 of 2015 before respondent no. 2; if such application is preferred, respondent no. 2 to decide it expeditiously in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties and without unnecessary adjournments. ¶11

Nabi Ahmed Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Court No. - 19

¶2

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3657 of 2024

¶3

Petitioner :- Nabi Ahmed

¶4

Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 6 Others

¶5

Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Suphal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶6

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶7

Heard.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the present petition has been preferred to direct the respondent no. 2 i.e. Civil Judge (Senior Division) FTC, Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Original Suit No. 258 of 2015 (Lalbahadur vs. Nabi Ahmed and others) filed by the Respondent No.3, in which the petitioner is defendant within the time as fixed by this Court.

¶9

On being specifically asked from learned counsel for the petitioner that whether petitioner has preferred any urgency application for early disposal of the suit by showing urgency in the matter before the Court concerned, it has been replied by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such application has been preferred before the Court concerned and petitioner has approached this Court directly for deciding the case expeditiously.

¶10

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that present petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the suit before the Court concerned and if any such application is preferred by the petitioner the same may be decided within the stipulated time fixed by this Court.

¶11

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the Original Suit No. 258 of 2015 (Lalbahadur vs. Nabi Ahmed and others) before respondent no. 2. If any such urgency application is preferred, it

¶12

is expected that respondent no. 2 shall decide the urgency application expeditiously in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without providing any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶13

Order Date :- 6.8.2024 S. Kumar

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Nabi Ahmed v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nabi Ahmed v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar and Others vs Sri Ramesh Singh, Distt. Inspector of Schools, Ballia

Jagdish vs Ms. Aakriti Srivastava Tehsildar Sarojini Nagar Lucknow

Mohd. Sadique and Others vs Sanjay Mishra, Executive Officer Nagar Palika Parishad, Gonda

C/M Shri Dayanand Inter College and Another vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Nabi Ahmed vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 6 Others

Rajendra Prasad Gupta vs Sri Deepak Kumar, Director, National Saving Directorate, Lko. and Another