Disposed

Shyam Murti v. Addl. Civil Judge (J.D.) Court NO.29, Sultanpur and Others

Allahabad HC6 Aug 2024/3637/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this matter under Article 226, the High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking directions for expedited disposal of a pending civil suit. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the subordinate court with an urgency application, directing the judge to decide it expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to move an urgency application for early disposal of the original suit before the respondent court.

Shyam Murti Vs Addl. Civil Judge (J.D.)… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:53801

¶2

Court No. - 19

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3637 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Shyam Murti

¶5

Respondent :- Addl. Civil Judge (J.D.) Court No.29, Sultanpur And Others

¶6

Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Kushal Tiwari

¶7

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶8

Heard.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition has been preferred for issuing directions to the respondent no.1 i.e. Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.29, Sultanpur to decide the Original Suit No.1165 of 2002 (Jagdish Prasad & Ors. vs. Raj Bahadur & Ors.) for permanent injunction, in which the petitioner is defendant no.2, within the stipulated time as this Court may fix.

¶10

It is further submitted that the petitioner has already filed his written statement on 07.07.2012 thereafter the issues were framed on 28.03.2014 and one of the issues framed by the trial court was with regard to the valuation of the suit and it was decided on 20.02.2020 against the respondent nos.2 to 6 and they were directed to file an amendment application. The amendment was filed in the year, 2022 and the same was allowed by order dated 10.06.2022 and since then the matter is pending, mostly the general dates are being given and lastly, the matter is fixed for hearing on the application 109ka2 for temporary injunction.

¶11

On being asked from the learned counsel for the petitioner whether petitioner has preferred any urgency application for early disposal of the aforesaid original suit, learned counsel for

¶12

the petitioner has replied that no such application has been preferred before the Court concerned and petitioner has approached this Court directly for deciding the suit expeditiously.

¶13

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that present petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the aforesaid original suit before the Court concerned and if any such application is preferred by the petitioner the same may be decided by the respondent no.1 within the stipulated time fix by this Court.

¶14

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of aforesaid original suit before the respondent no.1. If any such application is preferred, it is expected that respondent no.1 shall decide the urgency application preferred by the petitioner looking into the urgency mentioned therein expeditiously in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in case there is no any other legal impediment and if any adjournment is unavoidable only short adjournment may be given.

¶15

Order Date :- 6.8.2024 Mohd. Sharif

¶16

Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Shyam Murti v. Addl. Civil Judge (J.D.) Court NO.29, Sultanpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyam Murti v. Addl. Civil Judge (J.D.) Court NO.29, Sultanpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar and Others vs Sri Ramesh Singh, Distt. Inspector of Schools, Ballia

Jagdish vs Ms. Aakriti Srivastava Tehsildar Sarojini Nagar Lucknow

Mohd. Sadique and Others vs Sanjay Mishra, Executive Officer Nagar Palika Parishad, Gonda

C/M Shri Dayanand Inter College and Another vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Nabi Ahmed vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 6 Others

Rajendra Prasad Gupta vs Sri Deepak Kumar, Director, National Saving Directorate, Lko. and Another