Disposed

Prabhat Kumar v. Apar Up Ziladhikari, Sadar, Ayodhya and Others

Allahabad HC5 Jun 2024/2912/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition without entering into the merits. It granted liberty to the petitioner to file an urgency application before the concerned court for early disposal of the pending interim relief application and directed the respondent to decide it expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed with liberty to move an urgency application for early disposal of interim relief; respondent directed to decide it expeditiously.

Prabhat Kumar Vs Apar Up Ziladhikari, Sadar, Ayodhya… — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:42482

¶2

Court No. - 3

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2912 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Prabhat Kumar Respondent :- Apar Up Ziladhikari, Sadar, Ayodhya And Others

¶5

Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶6

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 7.

¶8

Present writ petition has been preferred to direct the respondent no. 1-Apar Up Ziladhikari, Sadar, Ayodhya to decide the stay application filed along with the Appeal bearing No. T-202304230110816 preferred under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, titled as 'Prabhat Kumar vs. Ambuj Agarwal and Ors.', which is pending since 12.10.2023.

¶9

On being asked from the learned counsel for the petitioner whether petitioner has preferred any urgency application for early disposal of the interim relief application filed alongwith the appeal, learned counsel for the petitioner has replied that no such application has been preferred before the Court concerned and petitioner has approached this Court directly for deciding the case expeditiously.

¶10

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that present writ petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the interim relief application before the Court concerned and if any such application is preferred by the petitioner the same may be decided by the respondent no.1 within the stipulated time fixed by this Court.

¶11

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶12

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of interim relief application filed alongwith the aforesaid appeal before the respondent no. 1. If any such application is preferred, it is expected that respondent no. 1 shall decide the urgency application preferred by the petitioner looking into the urgency mentioned therein expeditiously in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties

¶13

concerned and without providing any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶14

Order Date :- 5.6.2024 Nitesh

¶15

Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Prabhat Kumar v. Apar Up Ziladhikari, Sadar, Ayodhya and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhat Kumar v. Apar Up Ziladhikari, Sadar, Ayodhya and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shambhoo Nath Verma (in Wria- 694/1984, Order Dt. 30-03-1987) Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Family Welfare Deptt. and Another

Laxmi Narain Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 5 Others

Dr. Sudhir Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Animal Husbandry Deptt. Lko and Another

Smt. Sarojani Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Unnao and Others

Rajendra Prasad Dubey and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Collector District Ayodhya and 8 Others

Ram Pal and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Revenue, Lucknow and Others