Allowed

Karan Pasi v. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Department Civil Secretariat, Lucknow

Allahabad HC8 Apr 2024/2508/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Sections 302, 201, and 34 IPC, the Allahabad High Court granted bail to the applicant based on parity with a co-accused. The court noted the applicant's lack of criminal history as a favorable factor.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each, with conditions to attend hearings and not tamper with evidence.

Karan Pasi Vs State of U.P. through Secretary… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:29037

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2508 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Karan Pasi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home Department Civil Secretariat, Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Pratap,Shashank Shekhar Singh

¶5

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶8

The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.415 of 2023, under Section 302, 201, 34 IPC, P.S. Kasimpur, District Hardoi.

¶9

It is argued that the co-accused with similar allegations, has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 20.03.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.2738 of 2024.

¶10

Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶11

Considering the reasoning as contained in the order of the coaccused coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal history and is in custody since 07.10.2023, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant -Karan Pasi be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Rs. Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶13

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶14

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶15

¶16

inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

Order Date :- 8.4.2024 akhilesh/-

¶18

Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Karan Pasi v. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Department Civil Secretariat, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Pasi v. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Department Civil Secretariat, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rahul Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko

Ram Lautan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow, U.P.

Vijay Kumar Rana Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Secy. Chief Secy. Home Lko.

Master Shaarav Prasad Dahapute, Thru. Father Prasad Dahapute and Another Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Others

Deep Narain Nishad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Amit Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. of U.P. Lucknow and Others