Application for enlargement on bail in murder, abetment, and criminal conspiracy case. Court allowed bail citing similarity of allegations to co-accused with prior orders and explanation of antecedent.
Released on bail by furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:28086
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1888 of 2024
Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Rana Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Secy. Chief Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Himanshu Tiwari,Ajeet Kumar,Vedika Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Aditya Mishra,Anil Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 5.4.2024 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail considering a criminal antecedent and post-facto parole.
Whether the fact that co-accused have been enlarged on bail is a relevant factor.
Vijay Kumar Rana
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
