Suraj Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Urban Development Lko. and 2 Others

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:21128

Court No. - 17

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1861 of 2024

Petitioner :- Suraj Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Pandey

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties 1and 2 and Mr. Ramesh Chandra Pandey learned counsel for opposite party No.3.

¶7

Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the competent authority for payment of interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits due to petitioner in lieu of the fact that petitioner has superannuated from service on 30th June, 2019. It is submitted that earlier petitioner had filed writ A No. 6081 of 2023 which was disposed of vide order dated 24th August, 2023 on the basis of submission made by learned counsel for oppsotie parties that the entire dues shall be paid within a period of three months. It is submitted that despite such an undertaking, dues have not yet been paid for which contempt petition is also pending.

¶8

Considering aforesaid facts, in case petitioner has not been paid the retiral dues within a period of three months as undertaken on 24th August, 2023, the opposite party shall consider petitioner's grievance regarding payment of interest on the same within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is submitted before the said authority.

¶9

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶10

Order Date :- 11.3.2024 prabhat

¶11

Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Suraj v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Urban Development Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Suraj v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Urban Development Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Asmat Parveen Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Lko. and 3 Others

Krishna Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 4 Others

Shama Khatoon Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Secy. Minority Welfare and Wakf ANUBHAG-3, Lucknow and 6 Others

Anurag Chaudhary Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Public Work Deptt. U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

Malti Devi Vs Managing Director, U.P. Upbhokta Sahakari Sangh Ltd. Lucknow

Sudhir Kant Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dairy Development Lko. and 3 Others