The High Court dismissed an application for contempt under Order XXXIX of CPC. The respondent had decided the applicant's representation on 21.03.2024, and the court held no exchange of affidavits was needed to prove contempt.
Contempt application dismissed with liberty to applicant to challenge the order dated 21.03.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:30713
Court No. - 8
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1614 of 2024
Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- Shri Sadanand Saroj, S.D.M., Ambedkar Nagar Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Kumar Pandey,Shashank Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard.
Order Date :- 19.4.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent committed contempt by failing to comply with the order dated 12.02.2024 regarding the grant of Fair Price Shop License.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. State of U.P. and othersReferred¶9
Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. State of U.P. and others
Vivek Kumar Pandey
Shri Sadanand Saroj
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
