Contempt application alleging wilful disobedience of a 2014 writ court order was dismissed as barred by limitation under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the applicant's counsel being unable to explain the delay in filing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:45079
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1153 of 2022
Applicant :- Mohd. Nanhai
Opposite Party :- Shri Satya Narayan Singh, Director Ayurvedc Services, Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Lalendra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 2.7.2024 VKS
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt application filed eight years after the alleged disobedience order is barred by the one-year limitation under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Nanhai
Shri Satya Narayan Singh, Director Ayurvedic Services, Lko.
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
