Single judge of Allahabad High Court rejected interim anticipatory bail application. Court noted applicant's seven-case criminal history and his role as a witness in a sale deed executed by an imposter, deeming him not entitled to such relief.
Interim anticipatory bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:44708
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 595 of 2023 Applicant :- Sachin Shukla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Up Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Bhaskar Dutt Misra,Madhusudan Dutt Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
the applicant is not entitled for interim anticipatory bail.
Order Date :- 1.7.2024 V. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant, having a criminal history of seven cases and being a witness in an imposter's sale deed, is entitled to interim anticipatory bail.
Whether the applicant's cooperation readiness and prior bail to co-accused justify granting interim anticipatory bail despite his criminal history.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sachin Shukla
State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Up Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
