Krishna Kamal Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lucknow and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In a PIL regarding eviction of encroachers from specific plots, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus. The respondent's counsel reported that proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code had been initiated but were delayed due to a recall application. The court recorded this statement.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed on recording of statement; no immediate eviction order passed.