Disposed

Ashutosh Singh Pno. 062370253 v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC18 Nov 2024/10627/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A police officer prayed for transfer after exceeding the statutory limit at Dial-100/112. The court dismissed the writ petition but granted liberty to approach competent authority with department to consider transfer within two months.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; liberty granted to approach competent authority for transfer within two months.

Ashutosh Singh Pno. 062370253 Vs State of U.P… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:75581

¶2

Court No. - 6

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10627 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ashutosh Singh Pno. 062370253 Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pushpendra Kumar Sharma,Gurucharan Kashyap

¶4

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

¶7

The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to send back the petitioner from his attachment place i.e. U.P. Dial-100/112 Project, District Chitrakoot to his parent Department i.e. Civil Police, District Prayagraj (Allahabad).

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has completed more than 3 years of his posting at Dial 100/112. He further submits that as per the relevant Government Order issued in this respect, police personnel posted at Dial 100/112 should not remain posted for more than 7 years. It is further submitted that letters have been written by the competent authority for posting police personnel, who have completed more than 3 years of their posting at Dial 100/112, to some other place but the petitioner has not been relieved from his present place of posting to be posted elsewhere.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be given liberty to approach respondent No. 2 for taking appropriate action for relieving him from his present place of posting and post him elsewhere.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid submission, present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority i.e. Additional Director General of Police (Establishment), Uttar Pradesh, District-Lucknow (respondent no. 2) for relief of posting him out from Dial 100/112, who should consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order within a period of two months from the date petitioner approaches him for the relief sought in the writ petition.

¶11

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶12

Order Date :- 18.11.2024/RKM.

¶13

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ashutosh Singh Pno. 062370253 v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashutosh Singh Pno. 062370253 v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Radhey Shyam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Secretariats Administration, Lucknow and Others

Vishw Vijay Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Finance Lko. and 4 Others

Amit Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dept. of Finance Civil Secrtt. Lko. and Others

Surendra Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Revenue U.P. Lko. and Another

Deshraj Gaud @ Deshraj Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Panchayat Raj Lko and 3 Others

Shiv Ji Singh Vs State of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko and 2 Others