The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because it had lost its utility due to the efflux of time; no reason was recorded for the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:185187-DB
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 545 of 2022
Petitioner :- Meena Anand Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nishant Mishra,Rohan Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Gaurav Mahajan
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J.
Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition by efflux of time had been rendered infrcutuous and therefore, it be dismissed as such.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Department and learned Standing Counsel have no objection to this prayer.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.9.2023
R./
Digitally signed by :- RAJEEV KUMAR SACHDEVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Meena Anand
Union Of India
Siddhartha Varma
Manoj Bajaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
