The writ petitioner sought to avail the remedy under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. Counsel for both parties agreed to the prayer. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal principle was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:185131-DB
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9878 of 2023
Petitioner :- Smt. Ruchi Jain Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Narayan Singh, Vikas Singh, Vishakha Pande, Yashaswin Venugopal Bajpai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Ashok Shankar Bhatnagar, Sanjai Singh
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J.
Ms. Vishakha Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the writ petition be dismissed and the petitioner be permitted to avail the remedy available under The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Mr. Ashok Shankar Bhatnagar, learned counsel for respondent and learned Standing Counsel have no objection to this prayer.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 25.9.2023 R./
Digitally signed by :- RAJEEV KUMAR SACHDEVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Ruchi Jain
State Of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
Manoj Bajaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
